A very interesting thing happened at the end of July.
It affects every single practitioner in the public relations industry, indeed practitioners across all marketing disciplines.
And yet I haven't found one reference to it amongst the PR digerati yet, so I'm going to put that right. Now.
The subtleties of digital
At its core, this digital world is just a set of 1s and 0s that have been applied with increasing sophistication and power. It revolutionised the more numerical professions first, such as accounting and engineering in the seventies, before moving through manufacturing in the eighties and retail in the nineties.
In the noughties, "digital" arrived big style in the lives of marketing and PR professionals simply because it arrived big style in the lives of the stakeholders we look to communicate with, learn from and influence.
The bleeding edge of "digital" can now be expressed as the kind of things you'd almost think something that was digital would be least suited to. The kind of things that are considerably more subtle than the binary genesis of the digital world. Take our attempts to get machines to understand facial expressions for example, or codify our speech, or indeed simply interpret the sentiment expressed online by millions of people in words and pictures and video.
And so here we are, slap bang in the world of communication, persuasion and influence. We're in the domain encompassing how people feel about things. This is the world of feelings.
Enter EmotionML 1.0 stage left
EmotionML stands for Emotion Markup Language, and version 1.0 of the Working Draft was published by W3C on 29th July 2010.
What is it?
Well let's skedaddle over to Wikipedia for an explanation of the "markup language" bit:
A markup language is a modern system for annotating a text in a way that is syntactically distinguishable from that text. The idea and terminology evolved from the "marking up" of manuscripts, i.e. the revision instructions by editors, traditionally written with a blue pencil on authors' manuscripts. ...Markup is typically omitted from the version of the text which is displayed for end-user consumption. Some markup languages, like HTML have presentation semantics, meaning their specification prescribes how the structured data is to be presented, but other markup languages, like XML, have no predefined semantics.
So that would make Emotion Markup Language an attempt to allow us to markup any emotional content (anything that expresses feelings) with data describing those emotions.
Well having EmotionML is not the same as using it. That's why I was hosting a workshop in London on the day the EmotionML 1.0 working draft was published looking to do just that. We are looking at practical applications, and the challenges of facilitating the power of EmotionML without bamboozling social web participants. The ramifications are manifold.
If you are interested in finding out more and wish to contribute to this work, please do read my blog post from the workshop and get in touch.
Otherwise, if you just wish to be kept abreast, watch this space :-)
Best regards, Philip and the MarCom Professional team.
by Andrew Smith of escherman
For decades, PR has been seen by many marketeers as “cheap reach via editorial” – in other words, the goal of PR was to gain editorial coverage that provided the greatest number of opportunities to see – at a significantly lower cost than advertising. Because the means of providing a verifiable link between editorial coverage and business impact was either prohibitively expensive or just not possible, there has been a largely accepted assumption that positive press coverage is valuable – More...
by Philip Sheldrake of Influence Crowd LLP
Privacy is a personal thing. Some people want to be as “off grid” as they can get. And then there are those who actually bolt a camcorder to their heads and stream their life 24/7. Irrespective, I believe there are some things that everyone expects to be private by default; even Marc Zuckerberg! And one of these is your browser history… the log that lists every webpage you visit. It’s this list that enables modern browsers to suggest auto-completions for URLs as you enter them in the address bar. More...
by Scot McKee of Birddog Ltd.
I have had a busy summer shouting at stupid people. Having received a brief for a European corporate ‘Awareness Campaign’, I duly presented the accumulated wisdom of my many years of awareness campaigning to Sir and a considerable flock of subordinates, (including a slightly sallow, moist and inexplicably flaking representative from a media agency…). The client expressed his “disappointment” that I hadn’t addressed their need for a “value proposition”. More...
by Brian Solis of PR 2.0
Email, we love to hate it, yet we hate to love it. For better or for worse, we are tethered to our inbox and continue to send messages and respond to those individuals and organizations to which we’re tied or vested. Over the years, I’ve labeled email as the worlds largest untapped social network and even though many services attempted to socialize the inbox over the years, email, for the large part, remains regressive.
For the time being, brands and organizations continue to rely on email to connect and stay connected with various stakeholder communities. More...
by Vanessa DiMauro of Leader Networks
Effective community moderation often requires the ability to engage in (sometimes shameless) acts of human exchange. This has long been understood by experienced moderators.
We understand that modeling conversations is critical to getting people to engage with each other. We reach out to people by phone and email to ask their opinions and ideas, we search countless databases trying to find commonalities among people. We make jokes, we make friends, and perhaps most importantly we make human connections all mediated, to some degree, by the computer screen. More...
by Danny Whatmough of Wildfire
Some really interesting mini-research out today from Realwire’s Adam Parker and Andrew Smith of Escherman.
They took 50 online news sites from across different industry sectors and analysed them against three key areas: readership per article (average numbers of UK page views per Google indexed url per month), engagement (time spent per page to indicate how long a reader is likely to be spending reading that content when they get there) and UK relevance (what proportion of the sites readers as a whole come from the UK and would therefore be likely to be relevant if you were trying to reach a UK audience). More...
by Brian Solis of PR 2.0
Influence is a controversial topic and its measurement and definition is increasingly scrutinized as social media democratizes one’s ability to earn stature and prominence in new online societies. There’s a clear delineation between influence and popularity and it’s important to understand that in social networks, influence is not derived by the quantity of followers, friends, clicks, or “likes.” Nor is it discernible by the frequency of which one participates in their respective communities. More...
by Eric Tsai of Designdamage
You spent countless hours crafting your marketing campaign investing money and hiring marketing experts to help guide you through the process. You get ready to push the launch button, waiting for emails and phone calls come pouring in, then…
Nothing happens. But what could go wrong?
You did the things that the marketing “experts” said you should do with your keywords, putting up blog articles day after day, uploading videos and sending out email newsletters.
Here are 10 reasons why you’re not getting the attention, buzz and most importantly - the sales conversion. More...
by David Meerman Scott of David Meerman Scott
Regular readers of this blog know that my co-author Brian Halligan and I are nearing the end of our book tour for Marketing Lessons from the Grateful Dead. I’ll temper my Grateful Dead obsession and get back to writing about varied marketing and PR ideas starting next week… Thanks for indulging me with this series of Grateful Dead posts for the past few weeks.
If you’re completely fed up with all this Grateful Dead stuff, you MUST read this article by Terence Blacker in The Independent (UK): More...
by Andrew Grill of London Calling
On my recent trip to Sydney, I picked up an iPad (around £100 cheaper in Australia given I could claim back the 10% GST as I was taking it out of the country, and it is not subject to the “cost of doing business in the UK” Apple tax). What has amazed me is that everyone that has seen it has been ooh-ing and ahh-ing as if I had a new born baby sitting on the table in front of me. As the proud father of a beautiful 4 year old daughter, I know what this feeling is like.
The number one question I get from people who both own the iPad and those that are thinking of purchasing one is “what do you do on it?”. More...