<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Timesheets on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/timesheets/</link><description>Recent content in Timesheets on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/timesheets/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Time</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2007/11/time/</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2007/11/time/</guid><description>&lt;p>I want to sound you out about time. More specifically, billing, prompted by a recent article in the current edition of Business Week.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>And what&amp;rsquo;s happened to Business Week?  I was so confused by the format changes that I decided to Google the reason for it, and we&amp;rsquo;re told the redesign is inspired by the design imperatives of the Web.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/businessweek2008.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But, not being funny or anything, if I wanted Web I&amp;rsquo;d go to &lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">businessweek.com&lt;/a>
. Surely, if print is threatened by the big WWW, then differentiation is the key to success, not assimilation?&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>