<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Socioveillance on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/socioveillance/</link><description>Recent content in Socioveillance on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/socioveillance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>McVeillance, coveillance, and socioveillance in the context of social business</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/10/mcveillance-coveillance-and-socioveillance-in-the-context-of-social-business/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/10/mcveillance-coveillance-and-socioveillance-in-the-context-of-social-business/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Photographic lenses" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/Photographic_lenses_front_view.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I was a victim of McVeillance in June this year. I was walking around a shopping mall under systematic surveillance – CCTV everywhere – when I was accosted by security upon taking out my own camera to photograph the mall. (FYI, the mall itself was the subject of my photography and not its customers per se.)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Mann" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Steve Mann&lt;/a>
coined the expression &lt;em>McVeillance&lt;/em> after he was manhandled out of a McDonalds in Paris where he was eating with his family in 2012 for no other reason than for wearing a computer vision system. McDonalds was watching him. He was watching McDonalds. And &amp;rsquo;they&amp;rsquo; didn&amp;rsquo;t like it.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I wasn&amp;rsquo;t ejected from the mall as I was actually undertaking a project for the mall&amp;rsquo;s owners, unbeknownst to the security personnel. I was escorted to the security office for appropriate clearance – an act which, per Mann&amp;rsquo;s definitions, officially made me a surveiller.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The word &lt;em>surveillance&lt;/em> originates from French, from sur- ‘over’ + veiller ‘watch’ (from Latin vigilare ‘keep watch’). It invokes an authoritative orientation where one in authority, metaphorically if not physically above, watches those below. Mann had previously coined the word &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sousveillance" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;em>sousveillance&lt;/em>&lt;/a>
. The French for &amp;lsquo;below&amp;rsquo; is sous, hence the neologism for watching the watchers.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Organization is software</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/06/organization-is-software/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/06/organization-is-software/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Angkor Thom, Cambodia" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/AngkorThom.jpg"> This post is about an exciting vista for organization, one that may sound unhuman on the face of it but which, in contrast, I think could serve human dignity very well.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I first presented it in my &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2014/05/future-organization-video-presentation-major-themes-new-provocations/" title="The Future of Organization – a video presentation on the major themes and some new provocations">&lt;em>Future of Organization&lt;/em>&lt;/a>
video May 23rd, a presentation that appears to have been well received (and &lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/Sheldrake/the-future-of-organization" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the accompanying Slideshare&lt;/a>
accrued over 2000 views in the week). Given the variety and perceptiveness of the comments the video garnered I&amp;rsquo;m particularly pleased to have excused the presentation up front as being far from comprehensive. &lt;a href="http://www.consciousbusinesspeople.com/core-team/core-team/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pete Burden&lt;/a>
picked up on building inclusiveness and sustainability, and humanity, pointing me to &lt;a href="http://www.amed.org.uk/page/welcome-to-e-o-p-spring-2014" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this webpage on concious business&lt;/a>
. And soulfulness was at the heart of a similar exchange with Frederic Laloux, author of &lt;a href="http://www.reinventingorganizations.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reinventing Organizations&lt;/a>
. (I consequently elevated the book to the top of my to-read pile and at page 36 I&amp;rsquo;m enjoying it very much so far.)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Mr. Wirearchy himself, &lt;a href="http://wirearchy.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jon Husband&lt;/a>
, was good enough to &amp;rsquo;tweet out&amp;rsquo; (appended here). And my dear friend &lt;a href="http://cahane.co.uk/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gabbi Cahane&lt;/a>
wondered what balance of my living in the future and living in the present might be best for business. Hmm, good point :-)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In this post, I&amp;rsquo;m referring to what I&amp;rsquo;ve named &lt;em>Bread incorporated&lt;/em> – a distributed, self-regulating, incorruptible, frictionless market for organization. Here&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/Sheldrake/the-future-of-organization/71" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the slide&lt;/a>
in question and the transcript:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>