<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Sociocracy on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/sociocracy/</link><description>Recent content in Sociocracy on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/sociocracy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Number 1 Challenge for Humanity – Cooperating at Scale (part 2 of 2)</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2020/08/the-number-1-challenge-for-humanity-cooperating-at-scale-part-2/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2020/08/the-number-1-challenge-for-humanity-cooperating-at-scale-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="green plant" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/living-network-1493394-1024.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>First published to &lt;a href="https://akasha.org/blog/2020/08/07/cooperating-at-scale-part-two" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the AKASHA Foundation blog&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>In &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2020/07/the-number-1-challenge-for-humanity-cooperating-at-scale/">the first&lt;/a>
 of this two-part blog post I described why cooperating-at-scale is humanity&amp;rsquo;s primary challenge. Here I outline some candidate concepts and pre-architectural principles to inform the necessary and sufficient &amp;lsquo;sociotechnological primitives&amp;rsquo;.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>First I&amp;rsquo;d like to qualify &lt;em>pre-architectural&lt;/em>. It&amp;rsquo;s not oxymoronic despite &lt;em>arche&lt;/em> meaning &lt;em>origin&lt;/em> or &lt;em>beginning&lt;/em>. Both physical and software architecture originate structure and structural relationships, and we&amp;rsquo;re not yet at the stage to prescribe such things. Structure is ossified pattern and our purpose at this early stage demands instead that we offer just a little structure to open up the space to explore and nurture multiple patterns in preparation for the emergence of multiple structural forms. If &lt;em>pre-architectural&lt;/em> doesn&amp;rsquo;t do it for you, then perhaps think of it as a parsimony of design.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A means to &lt;a href="http://akasha.org/about/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">our purpose&lt;/a>
is the encouragement of multi-disciplinary cooperation towards ever-improving multi-disciplinary cooperation. At scale.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Nuclear physicists refer to the smallest amount of fissile material needed for a sustained nuclear chain reaction as the critical mass. No-one can know the variety or volume or patterns or structures of the methods, materials and mindsets required to constitute a critical mass for cooperation-at-scale, but perhaps your spidey senses are similar to our own &amp;hellip; maybe, just maybe, assembling such critical mass is a possibility nearer, rather than further away.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The Future of Organization – a video presentation on the major themes and some new provocations</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/05/future-organization-video-presentation-major-themes-new-provocations/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/05/future-organization-video-presentation-major-themes-new-provocations/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Office building in New York" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/office_building_newyork.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>There&amp;rsquo;s a lot to think about when it comes to the future of organization, and plenty to be optimistic about. Saying that, like any and all topics worth grappling with, it takes a bit of time to get up to speed on the depth and breadth of things. As a member of the &lt;a href="http://www.futureofwork.co/post/79984106877/future-of-work-advisory-council" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">advisory council&lt;/a>
for the &lt;a href="http://futureofwork.co/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Future of Work&lt;/a>
community, and part of the steering group for &lt;a href="http://theresponsiveorg.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Responsive Organization&lt;/a>
community, I know I&amp;rsquo;m not the only one looking to communicate these ideas effectively.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/mgrafham" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mike Grafham&lt;/a>
and I talked about compiling a three-minute explanatory video, and I failed woefully at such brevity. This 42-minute video presentation aims to provide a relatively speedy immersion in some of the main themes, spanning human rights, complexity science, the death of heuristics, the six influence flows, personal knowledge mastery, social physics, trust, the digital nervous system, Web 3.0, performance and learning, public relations, collective intelligence, sociocracy, Holacracy, podularity, wirearchy, emergent civilzation, self-organization, organized self, socioveillance, the middleware corporate, Bread incorporated, distributed autonomous corporates, and the Mozilla manifesto.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[embed width=&amp;ldquo;960&amp;rdquo;]http://www.vimeo.com/96201589[/embed]&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>