<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Socialmedia on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/socialmedia/</link><description>Recent content in Socialmedia on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/socialmedia/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How social media might help put UK politics on the right track</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/05/how-social-media-might-help-put-uk-politics-on-the-right-track/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/05/how-social-media-might-help-put-uk-politics-on-the-right-track/</guid><description>&lt;p>Election 2010 was supposed to be the UK&amp;rsquo;s first social media powered election, but with the advent of our first ever Leaders Debates, it became resolutely a TV-powered election.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But that doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean same-interest groups aren&amp;rsquo;t coalescing and making their point online; quite the opposite. It&amp;rsquo;s just that the majority of the British public aren&amp;rsquo;t that engaged with social media just yet. And don&amp;rsquo;t start with that &amp;ldquo;but Obama did it in 2008&amp;rdquo; malarkey&amp;hellip; sure, he ran a great campaign, but when you break it down you find that the majority &amp;ldquo;online&amp;rdquo; effort was plain old email marketing. Good on him, but this hardly makes anyone&amp;rsquo;s definition of social media.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Let&amp;rsquo;s take a brief look at two campaigns running right now, post-election.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>An outline of the Influence Scorecard</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/06/an-outline-of-the-influence-scorecard/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/06/an-outline-of-the-influence-scorecard/</guid><description>&lt;p>It has been a busy year for me with my departure from Racepoint Group following my so-called &amp;ldquo;transition period&amp;rdquo; and my setting up a new consultancy. So apologies for the delay in getting back on the topic of the Influence Scorecard.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/influencescorecard_strip.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>It hasn&amp;rsquo;t been far from my mind, particularly following the oodles of positive feedback in January and February, and believe you me, I&amp;rsquo;m intent on taking up your expressions of interest to meet before the year is out to take this forward. I want to collaborate with you. I want to find the most forward thinking &lt;a href="http://www.socialwebanalytics.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">social Web analytics&lt;/a>
vendors and forward thinking CMOs to put this into action, and commence the empirical fine tuning of the approach.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Most encouragingly, I have had fourteen companies in the social Web analytics space express their intent to get involved.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>So I&amp;rsquo;m leaping back into it with a SlideShare presentation. It&amp;rsquo;s concise. It&amp;rsquo;s an outline, and focuses on the &lt;em>what&lt;/em> rather than the &lt;em>how&lt;/em>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>We are one. We&amp;#039;d like to look like one, talk like one, act like one.</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/06/we-are-one-wed-like-to-look-like-one-talk-like-one-act-like-one/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/06/we-are-one-wed-like-to-look-like-one-talk-like-one-act-like-one/</guid><description>&lt;p>There is only one HSBC, one Nokia, one Ford, one Leica. That&amp;rsquo;s fact. More important than fact, the customer only sees there being one.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/nokia-flagship-london-lg7.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Which is the straight forward unquestionable reason why it upsets anyone at all when we interact with a representative of a company, or have any kind of communication with a company, and the response effectively belies the fragmentation of the organisation, the fact that the left hand doesn&amp;rsquo;t know what the right hand is doing and actually doesn&amp;rsquo;t care.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I put &amp;ldquo;they&amp;rdquo; in quotes, because we can learn two almost contradictory things from our use of this pronoun. First off, it indicates that we all recognise in natural language that an organisation is simply a collection of people. Just because the 20th Century bred organisations with tens of thousands of people making up &amp;ldquo;they&amp;rdquo;, doesn&amp;rsquo;t detract from the fact that it is still just people. Like you and me.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That&amp;rsquo;s why we use &amp;ldquo;they&amp;rdquo; as the pronoun for a company more often than not in place of the grammatically correct &amp;ldquo;it&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Secondly, the &amp;ldquo;they&amp;rdquo; also indicates what&amp;rsquo;s known as the reification of an organisation. In other words, we teach ourselves to consider the organisation as an entity in its own right, a thing, a tangible thing that lives and breathes of itself. We have abstracted it away from being the collection of individuals that it actually is.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>There is no such thing as a Twitter Strategy but you should have clear expectations for your corporate Twitter profile</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/04/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-twitter-strategy-but-you-should-have-clear-expectations-for-your-corporate-twitter-profile/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/04/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-twitter-strategy-but-you-should-have-clear-expectations-for-your-corporate-twitter-profile/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="corporate%20twitter" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/corporate_twitter.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;m amazed at the frequency with which I come across people discussing their &lt;em>Twitter Strategy&lt;/em>, or their &lt;em>Facebook Strategy&lt;/em>. Contrast this with offline terminology&amp;hellip; we never talk about a &lt;em>Press Release Strategy&lt;/em> or a &lt;em>Features Tracking Strategy&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Twitter and Facebook et al are one of many channels or platforms through which we wish to engage stakeholders in conversation. The strategy, then, is the plan we set ourselves for our use of social media to achieve our business objectives.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The strategy is constructed to meet our objectives and is informed by deep insight into best practice application of social media.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The strategy sets out the framework for our current and future adoption of social Web channels, platforms, services and gizmos. It helps us work out which of these to adopt and how they might work together. It describes the over-arching ethos and policies for social media use, organisation-wide, and clearly articulates how success is to be gauged, month in and month out.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>There is no such thing as &lt;em>Twitter Strategy&lt;/em>, and if you think there is then you are Twittering for Twitter&amp;rsquo;s sake and not for business success.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Enhancing Organisational Performance Management with the Influence Scorecard</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/02/enhancing-organisational-performance-management-with-the-influence-scorecard/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/02/enhancing-organisational-performance-management-with-the-influence-scorecard/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Influence%20Scorecard" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/influencescorecard_strip.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Last week &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/posts/philip.sheldrake/influence-scorecard---defining-influence-measurement-for-organisational-performance-management" title="I posted about hosting a meeting on the Influence Scorecard">I posted about hosting a meeting on the Influence Scorecard&lt;/a>
. The post was testing the water to determine the level of interest such an event might generate, and I was answered by dozens of emails, direct twitters, comments and even some direct editing of the post itself, as I&amp;rsquo;d hoped! (MarCom Professional allows an author to permit others to edit a post, wiki-style.)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I even received tentative enquiries about sponsorship, so it looks like we are on to something here&amp;hellip;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Moreover, the interest was split almost 50:50 between Europe and North America, and it was spread fairly evenly amongst each of the required participant groups.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>What is clear from all the queries and interest is that we now need to put some meat on the bones.  Here are a few top line thoughts on &amp;lsquo;influence&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;scorecard&amp;rsquo; and what we hope to achieve.  Your thoughts are welcome.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="influence">Influence&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Organisations want to influence the opinion and behaviour of their stakeholders. They do this via the various marketing and communications disciplines and approaches - PR, advertising, branding, community building, conversational marketing, direct marketing, events, product placement, public affairs, sponsorship etc..&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Of course, stakeholders also influence each other and some will want to influence an organisation - how ready an organisation is for this dialogue is another matter.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="scorecard">Scorecard&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The &amp;lsquo;scorecard&amp;rsquo; is inspired by the Balanced Scorecard, one of the most widely adopted organisational performance management methodologies (generally known as &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_performance_management" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">business performance management&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; or just plain BPM). According to the &lt;a href="http://www.balancedscorecard.org/BSCResources/AbouttheBalancedScorecard/tabid/55/Default.aspx" title="Balanced Scorecard Institute" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Balanced Scorecard Institute&lt;/a>
:&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Influence Scorecard - defining influence measurement for organisational performance management</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/01/influence-scorecard-defining-influence-measurement-for-organisational-performance-management/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/01/influence-scorecard-defining-influence-measurement-for-organisational-performance-management/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Influence%20Scorecard%202009" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/influencescorecard2009.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>When I first decided to write &lt;a href="http://socialwebanalytics.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Web Analytics eBook 2008&lt;/a>
, I had no idea it would attract over 10,000 downloads in 100 days. And why does it continue to be downloaded 1,000 times a month? In hindsight, the reasons are plain:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Listening to and learning from all our stakeholders is a widely and keenly felt desire&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Acquiring a grasp of the reputation our company and brands have notched up must constitute a key organisational performance metric for anyone&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Understanding how our interaction and dialogue with our stakeholders contributes to the achievement of our marketing and communications objectives helps us quantify how well we are meeting those objectives.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>What&amp;#039;s the difference between the social web and social media?</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/01/whats-the-difference-between-the-social-web-and-social-media/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/01/whats-the-difference-between-the-social-web-and-social-media/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="social" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/social.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;ve been asked at least a dozen times why &lt;a href="http://www.socialwebanalytics.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Web Analytics eBook 2008&lt;/a>
refers to the &amp;ldquo;Social Web&amp;rdquo; and not &amp;ldquo;Social Media&amp;rdquo;. In fact, the terms appear to have attracted similar usage according to a quick Google search count today:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&amp;ldquo;social web analytics&amp;rdquo; - Google estimates 18,600 results&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&amp;ldquo;social media analytics&amp;rdquo; - Google estimates 20,100 results&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>Interestingly, however, the term &amp;ldquo;social media&amp;rdquo; attracts more than twice the search count estimate as &amp;ldquo;social web&amp;rdquo;:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&amp;ldquo;social web&amp;rdquo; - Google estimates 8,250,000 results&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&amp;ldquo;social media&amp;rdquo; - Google estimates 19,700,000 results&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h2 id="so-whats-going-on-what-is-social-media">So what&amp;rsquo;s going on? What is social media?&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Social media is a subset of the social web.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The social Web and agenda setting: a presentation to today&amp;#039;s European Agenda Setting Conference, Zurich</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/12/the-social-web-and-agenda-setting-a-presentation-to-todays-european-agenda-setting-conference-zurich/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/12/the-social-web-and-agenda-setting-a-presentation-to-todays-european-agenda-setting-conference-zurich/</guid><description>&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;m presenting in one hour to the European Agenda Setting Conference on the impact of the social Web. Great presentations this morning from Roland Schatz, President &lt;a href="http://www.mediatenor.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Media Tenor&lt;/a>
, David W Moore, author of &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Opinion-Makers-Insider-Exposes-Behind/dp/0807042323" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Opinion Makers&lt;/a>
, and Ramu Damudaran, Director Civil Society at the United Nations.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Here&amp;rsquo;s my deck if you&amp;rsquo;re interested:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>View SlideShare &lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/Sheldrake/social-web-presentation-to-agenda-setting-2008-presentation?type=powerpoint" title="View Social Web Presentation To Agenda Setting 2008 on SlideShare" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">presentation&lt;/a>
or &lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/upload?type=powerpoint" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Upload&lt;/a>
your own. (tags: &lt;a href="http://slideshare.net/tag/socialweb" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">socialweb&lt;/a>
&lt;a href="http://slideshare.net/tag/socialmedia" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">socialmedia&lt;/a>
)&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Where the social Web goes from here</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/11/where-the-social-web-goes-from-here/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/11/where-the-social-web-goes-from-here/</guid><description>&lt;p>It&amp;rsquo;s good to talk. The more people can reach out and find the right people and organisations to relate to, to discuss the issues important to them, to learn, to hang out and have fun, to contribute content and opinion and ideas, then the more satisfying they will find being part of society. I’m no sociologist, but it sounds like a good heuristic to me.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/374735869_e788e77aa8.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I stand by the assertion in my ebook on &lt;a href="http://www.socialwebanalytics.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social Web Analytics&lt;/a>
: “Ultimately, the Social Web has revolutionised communications massively and irrevocably, to the benefit of the consumer, the adaptive and agile organisation, and those who cherish an open society.”&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Organisations’ engagement with the Social Web is still sufficiently nascent that it offers earlier adopters competitive advantage. And in the longer term however, it will be a condition of staying in the race.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>Three amazing things&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I’m posting today because three pretty amazing things have happened recently to catalyse this future; to extend the highly networked and &lt;a href="http://twitter.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter&lt;/a>
-fuelled connectivity enjoyed by the minority today to the general population. I discuss these below, but first let me put this into context for those of you who not only have a &lt;a href="http://www.friendfeed.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">FriendFeed&lt;/a>
, you’ve already fed it your &lt;a href="http://www.backtype.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">BackType&lt;/a>
profile.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>You’re not normal.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The Social Web Analytics eBook 2008</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/07/the-social-web-analytics-ebook-2008/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/07/the-social-web-analytics-ebook-2008/</guid><description>&lt;p>Social Web Analytics (SWA) is the application of search, indexing, semantic analysis and business intelligence technologies to the task of identifying, tracking, listening to and participating in the distributed conversations about a particular brand, product or issue, with emphasis on quantifying the trend in each conversation&amp;rsquo;s sentiment and influence.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The advent of SWA is a pivotal moment in the development of the marketing communications industry.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.socialwebanalytics.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;img alt="The%20Social%20Web%20Analytics%20eBook%202008" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/SWA_ebook_2008_med.png">&lt;/a>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>It&amp;rsquo;s just over ten weeks &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/posts/philip.sheldrake/listen.-the-science-of-social">since I posted about my intention to write an ebook&lt;/a>
on social Web analytics, and now it&amp;rsquo;s done. The ebook is hosted at &lt;a href="http://www.socialwebanalytics.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.socialwebanalytics.com&lt;/a>
, or you can simply &lt;a href="http://www.socialwebanalytics.com/The_Social_Web_Analytics_eBook_2008.pdf" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">click here to download it&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The B2B Social Web - my interview with the Ecommerce Times</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/05/the-b2b-social-web-my-interview-with-the-ecommerce-times/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/05/the-b2b-social-web-my-interview-with-the-ecommerce-times/</guid><description>&lt;p>The B2B Social Web has arrived and it&amp;rsquo;s not going to go away.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I was interviewed recently about the Social Web for a series of articles for Ecommerce Times, and here&amp;rsquo;s the first half of our conversation&amp;hellip;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>1) What is THE most significant issue regarding the appearance of Web phenomena like social professional networks?&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>If being an expert or leader in your market is defined as others&amp;rsquo; regard for your insight, skills or services, then you must participate in the networks where this expertise is being shared, and where the people you want to influence are going to help shape their viewpoint. For many professions, these networks remain predominantly offline, but this balance will tip in favour of online for most if not all professions eventually.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.marcomprofessional.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">MarCom Professional&lt;/a>
is a great example in my industry, and other social professional networks include &lt;a href="http://sermo.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">sermo.com&lt;/a>
for physicians and &lt;a href="http://inmobile.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">inmobile&lt;/a>
for the wireless industry.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>2) What major trends should my readers know about?&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The all-singing, all-dancing social network (Friendster, Myspace, Bebo, Facebook) will increasingly represent the minority of our online social networking. We will gravitate towards specialised networks dedicated to our specific sports interest, hobby, profession, health condition etc.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Listen. The Science of Social.</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/04/listen-the-science-of-social/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/04/listen-the-science-of-social/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/200px-Ear.jpg">I have been invited to no less than a dozen seminars, training courses and conferences about social media in the last month or so. In case you didn&amp;rsquo;t know, social media marketing is quite hot at the moment! Having presented on blogging for business since 2002, before this stuff got its own shows, and even &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/posts/philip.sheldrake/continuous-engagement...-the-death-of-market-research">mooted the death of market research in 2006&lt;/a>
, it&amp;rsquo;s fascinating to see how quickly people cut and paste together their own position on this stuff.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>One glaring betrayal of the &amp;lsquo;social media practices&amp;rsquo; that have only recently assembled their facade is their ignorance of the power of listening. They will tell you just how they will be your voice on the social Web, but too rarely do they volunteer to proxy your ears.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Listening to one person isn&amp;rsquo;t easy; active listening is a discipline. Imagine then trying to find, tap into and track one hundred conversations, a thousand, ten thousand; and interpretting this information&amp;hellip; turning it into knowledge that informs your marketing strategy and tactics.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="social-web-analytics">Social Web Analytics&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>This forms a large part of what we call social Web analytics. We define this as the application of search, indexing, semantic analysis and business intelligence technologies to the task of identifying, tracking (listening) and participating in the distributed conversations about a particular brand, product or issue, with emphasis on quantifying the trend in each conversation&amp;rsquo;s sentiment and influence.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Continuous engagement... the death of market research</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2007/10/continuous-engagement-the-death-of-market-research/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2007/10/continuous-engagement-the-death-of-market-research/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_44/b4007026.htm" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ESPN pulled the plug on their cell-phone product&lt;/a>
after investing $150m including $40m in advertising. This is precisely the failure market research is intended to prevent. How can business harness customers and prospective customers to improve their hit rate and time to market?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The following simple figures demonstrate the difference between traditional market research and continuous engagement.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/traditionalmarketresearch.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/continuousengagementloop.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>There are dozens of differences between the two approaches. Research is ad-hoc or at regular intervals whereas continuous engagement is, well, continuous. Research is one-way, and engagement is two-way. Research is devoid of any direct brand benefit (and research purists will claim this is beneficial) whereas continuous engagement inculcates brand loyalty. Here&amp;rsquo;s a list of the primary differences:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>