<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Socialgraph on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/socialgraph/</link><description>Recent content in Socialgraph on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/socialgraph/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>PR and Web 3.0... a call to action</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/02/pr-and-web-3-0-a-call-to-action/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/02/pr-and-web-3-0-a-call-to-action/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="PR%20and%20Web%203.0%2C%20and%20the%20ontology%20for%20feelings%20about%20things" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/PR_Web3_375.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Four things struck me in 2009. They are part of a bigger picture that means that public relations practice is about to undergo another change that will be as great this coming decade as it experienced during the last decade&amp;hellip;&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="1-web-20-participation">1. Web 2.0 participation&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>I dislike the 90:9:1 ratio of passives:occasionals:enthusiasts with respect to the &amp;ldquo;write&amp;rdquo; part of readwriteweb. In other words, 90% of people online don&amp;rsquo;t contribute anything, they remain passive consumers. 9% contibute content and interact now and then, and 1% are passionate bloggers, video makers, photo takers, wiki updaters etc.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Can you see it? Making influence visible.</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/08/can-you-see-it-making-influence-visible/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/08/can-you-see-it-making-influence-visible/</guid><description>&lt;p>There&amp;rsquo;s a revolution coming in public relations&amp;hellip; visualisation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/christopherbaker_mymap-e1338813654774.png" title="christopherbaker_mymap">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[Courtesy &lt;a href="http://christopherbaker.net/projects/mymap/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Christopher Baker&lt;/a>
]&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="picture-the-scene">Picture the scene&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>You hold an event to gather key stakeholders together, say a couple of dozen, and you want to maximise the  positive networking such an event should catalyse. You&amp;rsquo;re also aware of a few potential personality clashes.  But how many one-to-one relationships are you actually trying to manage here?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>It turns out, your relationship with each of them included, that there&amp;rsquo;s 300 relationships in that room!  Wow,  and compared to the big &amp;lsquo;World Wide Web&amp;rsquo;, or the even bigger &amp;lsquo;World&amp;rsquo; come to that, this is a relatively  insignificant number of people.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Let&amp;rsquo;s go a step further. Say that there&amp;rsquo;s just five critical issues facing your industry, each of which has  just three positions, say &amp;ldquo;for&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;against&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;no position&amp;rdquo;, then each stakeholder can have one of 243  combinations of points of view.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>To complete this picture, imagine now communicating the dynamic of this group in a report back to your boss say. How do you represent 300 relationships and 243 combinations of positions? Moreover, how do you portray the network evolving year-to-year, month-to-month, hour-by-hour?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Welcome to the world of data visualisation.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>