<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Shareholder-Value on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/shareholder-value/</link><description>Recent content in Shareholder-Value on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/shareholder-value/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Talking garbage and the purpose of business</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2015/05/talking-garbage-and-the-purpose-of-business/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2015/05/talking-garbage-and-the-purpose-of-business/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="garbage" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/garbage_can.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The third in a series on the topic of the purpose of business. Follows:&lt;/p>
&lt;ol>
&lt;li>&lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2015/04/what-exactly-is-the-purpose-of-business-an-answer-post-drucker/">What, exactly, is the purpose of business? An answer post-Drucker&lt;/a>
&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2015/05/debating-the-purpose-of-business/">Debating the purpose of business&lt;/a>
&lt;/li>
&lt;/ol>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>Business exists to establish and drive mutual value creation. &lt;a href="http://www.stevedenning.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steve Denning&lt;/a>
challenged this statement, preferring Drucker&amp;rsquo;s assertion that the purpose of business is to create and keep a customer. I responded, and he has challenged my response:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>we may be talking about different things: theoretical purpose of a firm and how to run it&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;satisfying all the stakeholders&amp;rdquo; isn&amp;rsquo;t a viable heuristic to run a firm. See &lt;a href="https://hbr.org/2013/06/making-management-as-simple-as" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;em>Making Management as Simple as Frisbee&lt;/em>&lt;/a>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>“satisfying all the stakeholders” was tried in mid20thC. It led to Garbage Can firms.&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>[&lt;a href="https://twitter.com/stevedenning/status/597361384758841344" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tweet&lt;/a>
 &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/stevedenning/status/597362842900267008" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tweet&lt;/a>
&lt;a href="https://twitter.com/stevedenning/status/597385555282939904" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tweet&lt;/a>
]&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="garbage">Garbage&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Steve refers to &amp;ldquo;garbage can firms&amp;rdquo; in his Forbes article, &lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2012/08/29/is-the-hegemony-of-shareholder-value-finally-ending/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;em>Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending?&lt;/em>&lt;/a>
, an eloquent take down of prioritizing the pursuit of shareholder value. When it comes to garbage it quotes a trio of academics – &lt;a href="http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2392088?uid=3738032&amp;amp;uid=2&amp;amp;uid=4&amp;amp;sid=21106376261501" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cohen, March and Olsen&lt;/a>
– who in 1972 explained:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>