https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/separation-of-concerns/Recent content in Separation-of-Concerns on Philip SheldrakeHugoen-gbThu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000https://philipsheldrake.com/2021/01/how-the-separation-and-unseparation-of-concerns-contribute-to-ssis-dystopian-promise/Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000https://philipsheldrake.com/2021/01/how-the-separation-and-unseparation-of-concerns-contribute-to-ssis-dystopian-promise/<p><img alt="By Julian Mora" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/julian-mora-v490AlsqbTs-unsplash.jpg"></p> <p><a href="https://www.good-id.org/en/articles/how-the-separation-and-unseparation-of-concerns-contribute-to-ssis-dystopian-promise/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Originally published by Omidyar Network&rsquo;s Good ID</a> .</p> <hr> <p>As Einstein intimated [1], everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Current architectures for digital identity — intended to meet some definition of the needs of the complex living system that is human society — are dangerously too simple for the task.</p> <p>Even self-sovereign identity (SSI), not infrequently held up by its champions as having the requisite complexity by design or claims to that effect, encodes distressing emergent outcomes.</p>