<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Reputation-Currency on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/reputation-currency/</link><description>Recent content in Reputation-Currency on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/reputation-currency/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Organization and personal reputation – from first principles to distributed autonomy</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/04/organization-personal-reputation-first-principles-distributed-autonomy/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/04/organization-personal-reputation-first-principles-distributed-autonomy/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Singapore harbour at night" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/singapore.jpg"> I&amp;rsquo;m no etymologist but it seems the verb &lt;a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=organize" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;em>organize&lt;/em>&lt;/a>
appeared in the 15th Century a few decades before the noun &lt;a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=organization" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;em>organization&lt;/em>&lt;/a>
. Sometimes we forget that the organization, in terms of the institution or firm, is merely a means to an end, and putting legal entities to one side for the moment, an organization is simply a group of people organized around a common purpose.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Reminding ourselves of such first principles is useful when considering how we might create and nurture new forms of organization and how we might improve the current dominant ones.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Jumping forward over 500 years, let&amp;rsquo;s get bang up to date on so-called social business, aka &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_2.0" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Enterprise 2.0&lt;/a>
, aka &lt;a href="http://www.theresponsiveorg.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Responsive Organization&lt;/a>
, aka &lt;a href="http://www.futureofwork.co/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Future of Work&lt;/a>
. The question that concludes &lt;a href="http://www.attenzi.com/seventy-two/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;em>Attenzi - a social business story&lt;/em>&lt;/a>
exemplifies the new vista:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Do you help all the individuals associated with your organization (employees, customers, partners, suppliers, shareholders, etc.) build worthwhile relationships with each other and others, coalescing by need and desire, knowledge and capability and shared values, to create shared value?&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>The verb &lt;em>coalesce&lt;/em> conveys the facility to combine, and so the facility to recombine, and re-recombine. The coalescence remains for just as long as shared value is created, and created faster than a new combination might afford. Such process appeals to free marketers for whom efficiency and utilisation are front of mind – after all why should resources be tied up in one combination when they can add greater value faster deployed in another? And there&amp;rsquo;s equal appeal to those on the left of the political spectrum who champion self-management and occupational autonomy.&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="relationships">Relationships&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Sometimes I define social business as &lt;a href="http://www.attenzi.com/fifty-nine/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">relationships at scale&lt;/a>
, and not just in the CRM 1.0 way:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Good business is about cooperative and interdependent relationships, always has been, yet the humanity was lost when organizations scaled way up during the 20th Century. We want to make those relationships more human again, but the answer can’t be to scale it all back down. We have to scale something else up.&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote></description></item></channel></rss>