<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Relationships on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/relationships/</link><description>Recent content in Relationships on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/relationships/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Webinar on identity, interpersonal data and collective minds for SSI Meetup</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2019/04/webinar-on-identity-interpersonal-data-and-collective-minds-for-ssi-meetup/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2019/04/webinar-on-identity-interpersonal-data-and-collective-minds-for-ssi-meetup/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="boy with painted face" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/boy-painted-face.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I was delighted to accept an invitation from Alex Preukschat to host a webinar earlier this week on the topic of digital identity for &lt;a href="https://ssimeetup.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SSImeetup.org&lt;/a>
. My presentation is based on the reciprocally-defining, inseparable conceptions of identity, relationships, and personal data — or interpersonal data as I like to call it after my &lt;a href="https://akasha.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">AKASHA&lt;/a>
colleague Mihai Alisie unjumbled my previous garbled attempts to make a distinction.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Groupon is bad for business – no April fool</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/04/groupon-is-bad-for-business--no-april-fool/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/04/groupon-is-bad-for-business--no-april-fool/</guid><description>&lt;p>According to BusinessWeek, &lt;a href="http://www.groupon.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Groupon&lt;/a>
could be the fastest growing business of all time – going from zero to rejecting a rumoured six billion dollar offer from Google two years later on the basis it seriously undervalued the company. It&amp;rsquo;s now eyeing up a twenty five billion dollar IPO. Not bad for a discount voucher business.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>My sister-in-law recently bought a £300 spa package for £100 via Groupon. Haircut, massage, manicure and pedicure. She&amp;rsquo;s delighted.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;Would you go back to the spa?&amp;rdquo; I ask. &amp;ldquo;Definitely&amp;rdquo; she replies. And then came the qualifier, unprompted: &amp;ldquo;When they run another Groupon deal.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In other words, the spa in question secured a transaction and eliminated themselves from building a mutually-valued relationship. My sister-in-law will now find it impossible to value the service in her mind at £300, or indeed much more than £100. And with Groupon taking 40-50% commission, it will have been a loss-making transaction at that (following standard accounting principles).&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>