<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Pulse on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/pulse/</link><description>Recent content in Pulse on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/pulse/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>It's all about curation</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/12/its-all-about-curation/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/12/its-all-about-curation/</guid><description>&lt;p>If one word has dominated social media in the second half of 2010, for me it&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;curation&amp;rdquo;. We have reached a certain maturity in our interaction with media to question our traditional abdication of curation to others.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Until recently, people we don&amp;rsquo;t know decided what we might like to read, listen to and watch. Our only choice, should we disagree with theirs, was to switch channel; change newspaper; retune the radio. And employ technology like personal video recorders to collect what we might want to watch later.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Now a new breed of services is emerging, sometimes referred to as social news aggregators.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>