<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Pagerank on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/pagerank/</link><description>Recent content in Pagerank on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/pagerank/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The power of social bookmarking and how to use it in your organisation today</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/08/the-power-of-social-bookmarking-and-how-to-use-it-in-your-organisation-today/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/08/the-power-of-social-bookmarking-and-how-to-use-it-in-your-organisation-today/</guid><description>&lt;p>The more stuff there is, the more difficult it is to find the right stuff at the right time.  Guess that&amp;rsquo;s almost Google&amp;rsquo;s raison d&amp;rsquo;etre, but have they got it right?  Is there a better or alternative search approach for you and your colleagues, and what would this mean for your marketing and search engine optimisation (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SEO&lt;/a>
)?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img alt="by%20Vit%F3%20http%3A//www.flickr.com/photos/janeladeimagens/166051502/" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/haystack.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Google&amp;rsquo;s highly secretive approach to working out what might be more relevant to your search query is called &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/tech.html" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">PageRank&lt;/a>
. Fundamentally, their innovation counts a link to a website as a vote for that website&amp;rsquo;s content.  And a link to your site from a higher PageRanked site is worth more than a link from a lowly site.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This approach blew the competition away (remember Alta Vista?), and Microsoft and Yahoo! have been playing catchup since.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But when was the last time you hyperlinked to a website?&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>