<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Open on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/open/</link><description>Recent content in Open on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/open/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Work IT: bring-you-and-your-own-everything</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2015/08/work-it-bring-you-and-your-own-everything/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2015/08/work-it-bring-you-and-your-own-everything/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="your-own-everything" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/your-own-everything.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://research.gigaom.com/2015/08/work-it-bring-you-and-your-own-everything/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">First published to Gigaom Research&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Cast your mind back a decade or more. Did you request specific hardware from your company’s IT team? If so, you started a trend that continues to play out to this day, and will continue to its logical and exciting conclusion.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>You may or may not have been successful in your request given IT’s historic intransigence, but nowadays many of us expect to rock up to work with the laptop and tablet and smartphone of our choosing – often our own – and expect the IT team’s full accommodation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>We’re also bringing our own applications. Non-IT staff have adopted software-as-a-service without necessarily going through their IT colleagues. Yammer, Trello and Slack for example. Perhaps Google Docs crept in without organization-wide adoption of Google for Work. Meeting schedulers. Note-takers. Expense trackers. Skype. Dropbox. Instagram. The list is as long as the kind of things you need to get done.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>It’s useful to think of this in terms of Enterprise IT and Work IT. The enterprise owns Enterprise IT whereas the worker owns Work IT. In simple terms, Enterprise IT is focused on the organization, Work IT on organizing. Enterprise IT is top-down with the starting position of locking everything down, whereas Work IT is bottom-up, thriving by facilitating sharing and openness.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Destroying the web</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/12/destroying-the-web/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/12/destroying-the-web/</guid><description>&lt;p>[&lt;a href="http://conversation.cipr.co.uk/posts/philip.sheldrake/destroying.the.web" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Written for the CIPR Friday Roundup&lt;/a>
.]&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The Internet is the most powerful, flexible and critical infrastructure ever invented. Every aspect of our daily lives is supported by this wondrous invention.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But here&amp;rsquo;s the important thing.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>We&amp;rsquo;ve passed the point where the fabric of our societies is supported by the Internet – the all pervasive Internet increasingly defines that fabric. Its architecture is becoming our architecture, and that is why any motion to challenge or change the way in which the Internet is governed must be subject to the most critical eye.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;ve been on tenterhooks the past fortnight watching the deliberations of WCIT play out – the World Conference on International Telecommunications. WCIT is a UN body that has played a vital role over nearly one and a half centuries coordinating telecoms standards and interoperability and radio spectrum and satellite orbits, and &lt;a href="https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2012/12/12/the-tragedy-of-the-itu/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">it has tried once again to wrestle Internet governance&lt;/a>
from the hands of the open community that has shepherded it so beautifully to date.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Social media are the eggs in the social business cake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/09/social-media-are-the-eggs-in-the-social-business-cake/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/09/social-media-are-the-eggs-in-the-social-business-cake/</guid><description>&lt;iframe allowfullscreen frameborder="0" height="309" mozallowfullscreen="" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/49168500?byline=0&amp;amp;portrait=0" webkitallowfullscreen="" width="550">&lt;/iframe>
&lt;p>A thrill of working in a fast changing market is the opportunity to innovate. A burden of working in a fast changing market is the need to bend existing language to new concepts. And of course, evoking existing language evokes existing meaning &amp;hellip; both an advantage and disadvantage.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>So, we&amp;rsquo;ve been working with &lt;em>social media&lt;/em> for the past decade; as if all preceding media was &lt;em>anti-social&lt;/em>. And during the past couple of years, we&amp;rsquo;ve been tasking our tongue to the topic of &lt;em>social business&lt;/em>; as if business previously attracted &lt;em>loners&lt;/em>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>CIPR Social Summer on mobile marketing</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/06/cipr-social-summer-on-mobile-marketing/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/06/cipr-social-summer-on-mobile-marketing/</guid><description>&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;m not a fan of the iPhone, or iPad come to that (more later). But it wasn&amp;rsquo;t until yesterday evening at the &lt;a href="http://www.cipr.co.uk" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CIPR&lt;/a>
that I learned quite how manic some marketers have become. The following conversation won&amp;rsquo;t be verbatim as I wasn&amp;rsquo;t party to it, but it&amp;rsquo;s a good representation of the story as I heard it last night from those who are having these conversations too regularly:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>_________&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Marketer&lt;/em>: &lt;strong>We need an iPhone app?&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Mobile marketing expert&lt;/em>: &lt;strong>Righteo. Why&amp;rsquo;s that?&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Marketer&lt;/em>: &lt;strong>Because they&amp;rsquo;re really cool and cool&amp;rsquo;s where it&amp;rsquo;s at for our target demographic.&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Mobile marketing expert&lt;/em>: &lt;strong>Cool, yes, and who&amp;rsquo;s the target?&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Marketer&lt;/em>: &lt;strong>Teenagers.&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Mobile marketing expert&lt;/em>: &lt;strong>Do you know that iPhone penetration is just 4% in the UK, and that&amp;rsquo;s only 0.5% amongst UK teenagers?&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Marketer&lt;/em>: &lt;strong>Oh :-(&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>_________&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The bring all sorts of people together under one roof for a beer and a chat about specific interesting issues. On conducting a quick straw poll of the super collection of people last night, we had roughly an equal split of Blackberrys, iPhones, Android (mostly HTC) and &amp;lsquo;other&amp;rsquo;, making for an unrepresentatively high proportion of smartphones.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>