<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Network-Analysis on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/network-analysis/</link><description>Recent content in Network-Analysis on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/network-analysis/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Setting the standards for influence</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/02/setting-the-standards-for-influence/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/02/setting-the-standards-for-influence/</guid><description>&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;m a special advisor to &lt;a href="http://amecorg.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">AMEC&lt;/a>
(the Association for the Measurement and Evaluation of Communication), wearing a CIPR hat as and when. I&amp;rsquo;m part of a working group assembling recommendations on the topic of influence for deliberation at the AMEC European Summit in Madrid this June. We have input from IPR, PRSA, Womma, SNCR, IAB and other groups, associations and institutes.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I took an action to create &amp;ldquo;something to shoot at&amp;rdquo;, and I distributed the following over the weekend. On the basis that we&amp;rsquo;re an open and transparent working group, I thought I&amp;rsquo;d post it here too. Do get in touch if you&amp;rsquo;d like to tell me what you think. Now&amp;rsquo;s the time for dialogue – particularly if you can&amp;rsquo;t attend the Madrid summit – ahead of the standards setting.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>