<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Measurepr on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/measurepr/</link><description>Recent content in Measurepr on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/measurepr/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Influence – request for comments</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/03/influence-request-for-comments/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/03/influence-request-for-comments/</guid><description>&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;m chairing a session at midday today at the &lt;a href="http://oursocialtimes.com/socialmediameasurement/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social Media Measurement &amp;amp; Monitoring&lt;/a>
conference on selecting social media metrics. Joining me on the panel are Katie Delahaye Paine, Andrew Smith, Matt Owen, and Jacqui Taylor.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>See you there?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>To coincide with this event, I&amp;rsquo;m calling for comments regarding the standards setting process for the concept of influence ahead of the AMEC European Summit in June. Please take a look at this stack, and influence proceedings :-)&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The hunt for a new universal measure – we will never find it</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/07/the-hunt-for-a-new-universal-measure-we-will-never-find-it/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/07/the-hunt-for-a-new-universal-measure-we-will-never-find-it/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://bcove.me/qd3qj28a" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;img alt="PR Week podcast screenshot" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/prweek-podcast-screenshot-550.png" title="PR Week podcast screenshot">&lt;/a>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The title of this post is one of my contributions to the recent PR Week video podcast on measurement where I was a guest alongside &lt;a href="http://www.spectrum-consulting.net" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SpectrumInsight&lt;/a>
&amp;rsquo;s Mark Westaby. PR Week&amp;rsquo;s Sara Luker was in the chair, and it was fifteen minutes of good conversation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>As I say upfront, I&amp;rsquo;m a bit more optimistic than Mark about the future of the measurement and accountability of public relations, if only because I have faith in the Influence Scorecard approach.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Ethics in PR Measurement</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/08/ethics-in-pr-measurement/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/08/ethics-in-pr-measurement/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2010/08/ethics-in-pr-measurement/headshot-personal-small/">&lt;img alt="Shonali Burke" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/headshot-personal-small.jpg" title="Shonali Burke">&lt;/a>
I took part in the &lt;a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23measurepr" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">#measurepr&lt;/a>
Twitter chat today on ethics in measurement. These chats are organised by &lt;a href="http://www.waxingunlyrical.com/about/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shonali Burke&lt;/a>
and her blog post &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://www.waxingunlyrical.com/2010/08/16/influence-from-bs-to-best-practice/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Influence: From BS to Best Practice&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; set the scene nicely.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>At the most fundamental level, we were asking whether some of the techniques being deployed for PR measurement are compatible with the aspiration of public relations professionals to be transparent and authentic, and, more precisely, whether they are compatible with codes of conduct as published by the likes of the &lt;a href="http://www.cipr.co.uk/content/membership-networking/code-conduct" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CIPR&lt;/a>
, &lt;a href="http://www.prsa.org/AboutPRSA/Ethics/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">PRSA&lt;/a>
and &lt;a href="http://www.cprs.ca/aboutus/code_ethic.aspx" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CPRS&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In one of my tweets I suggested a more straight forward test, what one might describe as a layman&amp;rsquo;s test for those of us uneducated in the matters of ethics:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>RT @&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/kseniacoffman" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">kseniacoffman&lt;/a>
: Q2: Where do you go for best practices? &amp;lt;&amp;ndash; Ask your mum, siblings, neighbours what&amp;rsquo;s acceptable to them!? &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23measurepr" title="#measurepr" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">#measurepr&lt;/a>
&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>At Shonali&amp;rsquo;s invitation, I contributed the three questions posed today&amp;hellip;&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>