<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Measurement-Week on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/measurement-week/</link><description>Recent content in Measurement-Week on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/measurement-week/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Influence measurement – a contribution to AMEC Measurement Week 2014</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/09/influence-measurement-contribution-amec-measurement-week-2014/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/09/influence-measurement-contribution-amec-measurement-week-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p>In &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2014/06/measuring-communications-reconciling-models-amsterdam/" title="Measuring communications and reconciling models, after Amsterdam">my last post on the topic of AMEC and measurement&lt;/a>
, I noted:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>AMEC is the Association for the Measurement and Evaluation of Communication, not &amp;ldquo;of Media&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>I have taken that as the theme for my contribution to AMEC Measurement Week 2014, which kicks off Monday. &lt;a href="http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/jon-white/0/3b0/b36" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Jon White&lt;/a>
is another influence who, in a recent exchange, pointed out that the problems of measurement in public relations are largely the result of the approach taken to management in public relations work.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>