<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Mathematics on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/mathematics/</link><description>Recent content in Mathematics on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/mathematics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Influence... it&amp;#039;s a numbers game</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/12/influence-its-a-numbers-game/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/12/influence-its-a-numbers-game/</guid><description>&lt;p>Andrew Smith tickled my fractal with his post yesterday &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/where-are-the-pr-numerati-is-stephen-baker-reading-this/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Where are the PR Numerati?&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; (and &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/posts/andrew.smith/where-are-the-pr-numerati-is-stephen-baker-reading-this">here&lt;/a>
on MarCom Professional). Why? Because he&amp;rsquo;s right and I&amp;rsquo;m numerate and I&amp;rsquo;m in PR. His post was prompted by the August 2008 book &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://thenumerati.net/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Numerati&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; by senior Business Week writer Stephen Baker.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Public relations had been boiled down to a very simple process by the end of the 1990s. Journalists write the papers and magazines the public reads. The PRs know the journalists. The clients retain the PR professionals.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That simple world is no more. I don&amp;rsquo;t mean that traditional media relations no longer exists, only that it is now just a sub-set of a far more complex map of exerting influence.  The best PR professionals will:&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Write-off reading and writing. The three R&amp;#039;s are dead; long live the three M&amp;#039;s</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/03/write-off-reading-and-writing-the-three-rs-are-dead-long-live-the-three-ms/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/03/write-off-reading-and-writing-the-three-rs-are-dead-long-live-the-three-ms/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/visualworld.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Despite the hammerings of educationalists, the so-called three R&amp;rsquo;s are far from sacrosanct: &lt;strong>r&lt;/strong>eading, w&lt;strong>r&lt;/strong>iting and a&lt;strong>r&lt;/strong>ithmetic. I’m talking specifically about the first two of these.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>(OK, I’m not talking about them, I am actually writing and that irony isn’t lost on me. But then I am future gazing, and I could after all have podcast this post.)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Reading and writing have been bedrocks of civilisation, some would say &lt;em>the&lt;/em> foundation, and it is only relatively recently that they have had competition as a media for non-synchronous communication. The 20th Century triumphs of broadcast radio, broadcast TV and semiotics compensated slightly for an individual’s illiteracy, but they were far from a perfect substitute and entirely useless when that individual wished to communicate back.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The 21st Century hasn’t taken long however to present a cornucopia of communication possibilities. Whilst applications of the Internet were dominated just a few years ago by text, and lots and lots of it, new applications pivot massively around the audio-visual. &amp;ldquo;Radio&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;TV&amp;rdquo; over IP / Narrowcasting / Podcasting / Moblogging / Vlogging / On Demand / Voice over IP / Video conferencing&amp;hellip;&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>