<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Influencer-Marketing on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/influencer-marketing/</link><description>Recent content in Influencer-Marketing on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/influencer-marketing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>"We called it influencing the influencers." Adobe. Late-80s.</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/08/called-influencing-influencers-adobe-late-80s/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/08/called-influencing-influencers-adobe-late-80s/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Adobe influencing the influencers" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/Adobe-influencing-the-influencers.png">You have been influenced when you think something you wouldn&amp;rsquo;t otherwise have thought, or do something you wouldn&amp;rsquo;t otherwise have done.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In the 20th Century, the marketing department did marketing, the PR people did PR, and no job title included the word &lt;em>influence&lt;/em>. To this day, no role or team or department in the typical organization incorporates the word, which is why I pivot my client workshops around the topic of influencing and being influenced – not only does it address the actual thing we&amp;rsquo;re all interested in, it helps lower ego defence and removes functional blinkers.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Influencing Influencer Marketing</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/05/influencing-influencer-marketing/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/05/influencing-influencer-marketing/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.womma.org/influencers" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;img alt="WOMMA Influencer Guidebook 2013" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/WOMMA-Influencer-Guidebook-2013.png" title="WOMMA Influencer Guidebook 2013">&lt;/a>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.womma.org" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">WOMMA&lt;/a>
&amp;rsquo;s new &lt;a href="http://www.womma.org/influencers" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">guidance on influencer marketing&lt;/a>
begins with the assertion: &amp;ldquo;This is not an update to the 2008 WOMMA Influencer Handbook - this is a complete rewrite &amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;m not a WOMMA member but I am a special adviser to &lt;a href="http://www.amecorg.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">AMEC&lt;/a>
and &lt;a href="http://smmstandards.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Conclave&lt;/a>
, and it was in this capacity that &lt;a href="http://www.kellerfay.com/about/our-team/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brad Fay&lt;/a>
and I invested more than a few hours with WOMMA&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/neilbeam" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Neil Beam&lt;/a>
to lend our insight and points of view and, we hope, help make this guidebook the complete rewrite it&amp;rsquo;s turned out to be.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;ve expressed Euler Partners&amp;rsquo; approach to influence in recent posts, notably &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2013/03/influence-request-for-comments/">Influence - request for comments&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; (slidestack included below for your convenience), and we were delighted to have the opportunity to present these to the WOMMA team. In particular:&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Setting the standards for influence</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/02/setting-the-standards-for-influence/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/02/setting-the-standards-for-influence/</guid><description>&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;m a special advisor to &lt;a href="http://amecorg.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">AMEC&lt;/a>
(the Association for the Measurement and Evaluation of Communication), wearing a CIPR hat as and when. I&amp;rsquo;m part of a working group assembling recommendations on the topic of influence for deliberation at the AMEC European Summit in Madrid this June. We have input from IPR, PRSA, Womma, SNCR, IAB and other groups, associations and institutes.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I took an action to create &amp;ldquo;something to shoot at&amp;rdquo;, and I distributed the following over the weekend. On the basis that we&amp;rsquo;re an open and transparent working group, I thought I&amp;rsquo;d post it here too. Do get in touch if you&amp;rsquo;d like to tell me what you think. Now&amp;rsquo;s the time for dialogue – particularly if you can&amp;rsquo;t attend the Madrid summit – ahead of the standards setting.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>