<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Imaginationcubed on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/imaginationcubed/</link><description>Recent content in Imaginationcubed on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/imaginationcubed/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Graphic engagement</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2007/11/graphic-engagement/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2007/11/graphic-engagement/</guid><description>&lt;p>Here at &lt;a href="http://www.racepointgroup.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Racepoint&lt;/a>
we&amp;rsquo;ve been thinking about the ramifications of one of my previous posts, &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/posts/philip.sheldrake/continuous-engagement...-the-death-of-market-research">Continuous engagement&amp;hellip; the death of market research&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo;. A particular area of interest is the way in which we might help companies interact with stakeholders other than via text-based media.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Yes, I know there&amp;rsquo;s the telephone too, but following the tenet that restricting the channel can only restrict the quantity and quality of interaction, how else can we reach out and engage?&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>