<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Guidance on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/guidance/</link><description>Recent content in Guidance on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/guidance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How dare they!</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/04/how-dare-they/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/04/how-dare-they/</guid><description>&lt;p>[Written originally for &lt;a href="http://conversation.cipr.co.uk/posts/philip.sheldrake/how.dare.they" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the CIPR Friday Roundup&lt;/a>
.]&lt;/p>
&lt;p>You should not make edits to a Wikipedia entry when you have a conflict of interest, as any PR practitioner does in relation to their employer or client. Simple.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57575460-93/bp-accused-of-rewriting-environmental-record-on-wikipedia/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;img alt="CNET screenshot BP Wikipedia" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/CNET-screenshot-BP-Wikipedia.png">&lt;/a>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This Wikipedia rule is reflected precisely in &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2012/06/version-1-of-wikipedia-guidance-for-pr-practitioners/" title="Version 1 of Wikipedia guidance for PR practitioners">the CIPR&amp;rsquo;s Wikipedia guidance&lt;/a>
, published by the social media panel last summer and supported by PR bodies in Canada, Australia and South Africa. (Although not yet in the US.)&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Version 1 of Wikipedia guidance for PR practitioners</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/06/version-1-of-wikipedia-guidance-for-pr-practitioners/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/06/version-1-of-wikipedia-guidance-for-pr-practitioners/</guid><description>&lt;p>[Update: &lt;a href="http://www.cipr.co.uk/content/policy-resources/best-practice-guides-toolkits/wikipedia-and-public-relations" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Version 2 of the Wikipedia guidance was published May 2014&lt;/a>
.] &lt;a href="http://cipr.co/wiki-guide" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;img alt="Wikipedia Guidance from the CIPR" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/Wikipedia-Guidance-front-cover.png" title="Wikipedia Guidance from the CIPR">&lt;/a>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;m delighted that &lt;a href="http://cipr.co/wiki-guide" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the first comprehensive guidance to public relations practitioners on engaging with the Wikipedia community&lt;/a>
is published today by the CIPR. Here&amp;rsquo;s the process we&amp;rsquo;ve gone through:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;gt; Early January 2012 – The CIPR Social Media panel meets and recognises that current guidance is lacking (see &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2012/01/reputation-and-wikipedia/">my post of 6th January&lt;/a>
)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;gt; Mid-January 2012 – PR Week&amp;rsquo;s Editor in Chief, Danny Rogers, calls on the CIPR to clarify its guidance to members, and the profession more widely (&amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://www.prweek.com/uk/opinion/1112555/Danny-Rogers-CIPR-set-bar-high-Wikipedia-code/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CIPR must set bar high on Wikipedia code&lt;/a>
&amp;quot;)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;gt; January - April 2012 – The Social Media panel&amp;rsquo;s Gemma Griffiths leads the development of a first draft of guidance; &amp;ldquo;something to shoot at&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;gt; 12th May 2012 – Neville Hobson and I take part in the Wikimedia UK AGM to call for their help in working up the guidance (see &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2012/05/reputation-and-wikipedia-part-ii/">my post of 14th May&lt;/a>
)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;gt; 14th May 2012 – The first draft is uploaded to Wikimedia UK&amp;rsquo;s wiki&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;gt; To 24th June 2012 – We collaborate with Wikimedians on more than 160 edits on the back of a discussion page running to more than twelve thousand words. &lt;/p></description></item><item><title>CIPR TV: Wikipedia guidance to PR practitioners to be published next week</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/06/cipr-tv-wikipedia-guidance-to-pr-practitioners-to-be-published-next-week/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/06/cipr-tv-wikipedia-guidance-to-pr-practitioners-to-be-published-next-week/</guid><description>&lt;iframe allowfullscreen frameborder="0" height="309" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/N9y_c8woMIc" width="549">&lt;/iframe>
&lt;p>I swapped sofas on CIPR TV yesterday, seeing the studio from the guests&amp;rsquo; perspective for a change. Gemma Griffiths presented the show and David Gerrard and I were the guests.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>David is Wikimedia UK&amp;rsquo;s volunteer spokesperson. As you may know, I&amp;rsquo;ve been helping to lead a dialogue between Wikimedia UK and the CIPR to build mutual understanding, and specifically to co-develop definitive guidance to PR practitioners on how to engage with the Wikipedia community.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>