<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Ft on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/ft/</link><description>Recent content in Ft on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/ft/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>FT writes about &amp;quot;Gated Communities in Cyberspace&amp;quot;</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/01/ft-writes-about-gated-communities-in-cyberspace/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/01/ft-writes-about-gated-communities-in-cyberspace/</guid><description>&lt;p>The word Cyberspace always makes me chuckle for some reason. Not sure why. Anyway, I noticed an article recently in the FT - &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c208f300-c2f5-11dc-b617-0000779fd2ac.html" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Business urged to woo social network figures&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; - about a report from Experian and Hitwise saying, well, that business should make sure they look after influential people online. Cool. My headline would be &amp;ldquo;Influential people are influential people, online or off&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But it was the box-out in the article that I wanted to highlight here, particularly as it relates to this MarCom Professional network. Not sure about the examples though.  I quote&amp;hellip;.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>