<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Friends-of-the-Earth on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/friends-of-the-earth/</link><description>Recent content in Friends-of-the-Earth on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/friends-of-the-earth/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Daily Telegraph article picked apart by Friends of the Earth in an advert in the FT</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/04/daily-telegraph-article-picked-apart-by-friends-of-the-earth-in-an-advert-in-the-ft/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/04/daily-telegraph-article-picked-apart-by-friends-of-the-earth-in-an-advert-in-the-ft/</guid><description>&lt;p>I posted &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2012/04/earned-media-is-not-a-synonym-for-public-relations/">&amp;lsquo;Earned media&amp;rsquo; is not a synonym for public relations&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; late last night. One of the points I made in the post is that a PR campaign may well involve advertising, as odd as the application of the misguided Paid Owned Earned media taxonomy may make people think this might be.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>And then I stumbled across this beautiful ad by the Friends of the Earth in the Financial Times today, literally identifying elements of a Daily Telegraph article they consider to be flawed or indeed down right incorrect. I would classify this as an attempt by Friends of the Earth to achieve mutual understanding with stakeholders; as public relations.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>