<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Forget on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/forget/</link><description>Recent content in Forget on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/forget/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Access to this search result is denied, unless you have the money of course</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/05/access-search-result-denied-unless-money-course/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/05/access-search-result-denied-unless-money-course/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="access to this search result is denied" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/access-denied.png"> Today, &lt;a href="https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_eudpa?product=websearch" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Google has published a webpage with a form&lt;/a>
allowing anyone in Europe to ask that personal data be removed from search results. This follows the recent ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union, deciding that:&lt;/p>
&lt;ol>
&lt;li>Indexing information by a search engine is ‘processing of personal data’&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Google is a ‘controller’ of personal data&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Spanish data protection law is applicable, even if indexing happens in the US&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Google should remove links to webpages containing personal data, even if the webpages themselves are lawful&lt;/li>
&lt;li>A fair balance should be sought between the legitimate interests of search engine users and the privacy rights of individuals&lt;/li>
&lt;li>The right to be forgotten is recognised by the Court of Justice.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ol>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;ve owned the domains &lt;em>forgetweb.com&lt;/em> and &lt;em>forgetweb.org&lt;/em> since 2010, so this is something I&amp;rsquo;ve contemplated for some time and the domain names betray my leaning, yet I can confidently say the Court has got it wrong. Julian David, techUK CEO, explains why in The Telegraph: &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10836647/Forget-about-it-the-ECJ-ruling-on-the-right-to-be-forgotten-is-unworkable.html" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Forget about it: the ECJ ruling on the &amp;lsquo;right to be forgotten&amp;rsquo; is unworkable&lt;/a>
.&amp;rdquo; I support his balanced sentiment 100% and would add one more vitally important perspective.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>