<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Excellence on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/excellence/</link><description>Recent content in Excellence on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/excellence/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>GREAT (PR)ODUCT</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/02/great-product/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2013/02/great-product/</guid><description>&lt;p>I have asked six people with senior positions in techie professions who they thought &amp;ldquo;does great PR&amp;rdquo; in the tech sector. Now these individuals are not in marketing and PR functions, so you&amp;rsquo;ll forgive my casual turn of phrase I hope.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Apple iPad mini – GREAT (PR)ODUCT" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/apple_ipad_great_product.png">You might know I detest the idea that you might &amp;ldquo;PR something&amp;rdquo;, as if PR is as tactical and atomic as picking up the phone or putting a release on a wire, but I deliberately didn&amp;rsquo;t wish to infect them with my view of public relations excellence. I wanted to hear what they&amp;rsquo;d say unprompted, unguided.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Each proffered two or three companies. Samsung and IBM were mentioned twice. Google thrice. But out front with four mentions was Apple.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Now anyone who follows the world&amp;rsquo;s first or second largest publicly traded corporation in the world by market capitalization (it swaps places regularly with Exxon Mobil) will know that they&amp;rsquo;re actually quite a secretive bunch. Steve Jobs infected the company with the idea that it knows what&amp;rsquo;s best for the customer, and any idea that it should work with the rest of us in defining future products and services appears plain counter-cultural.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>If you, like me, &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2011/11/public-relations-defined-%E2%80%93-the-anatomy-of-a-candidate-definition-ver-0-2/">define public relations as pursuing mutual understanding to build goodwill&lt;/a>
, the PR function at Apple appears quite asymmetric. As and when it suits its agenda, they&amp;rsquo;ll tell you. Otherwise get back in line. End of. I always feel a reluctance on Apple&amp;rsquo;s part to discuss &lt;a href="http://www.shanghaidaily.com/nsp/National/2012/09/06/Students%2Bsay%2Bthey%2Bare%2Bforced%2Bto%2Bwork%2Bon%2Bnew%2BiPhone%2B5/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">its contractors&amp;rsquo; labour practices&lt;/a>
, its own environmental and business practices, and &lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/02/apple-maps-fire-australia/62116/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the occasional product mess up&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>