<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Drewbenvie on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/drewbenvie/</link><description>Recent content in Drewbenvie on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/drewbenvie/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Dear PR Week, it&amp;#039;s not about Twitter per se</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/02/dear-pr-week-its-not-about-twitter-per-se/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/02/dear-pr-week-its-not-about-twitter-per-se/</guid><description>&lt;p>In an unstunningly simple article in PR Week today (&amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://www.prweek.com/uk/home/article/884307/twitter-suddenly-exploded/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter has suddenly exploded&lt;/a>
&amp;quot;) we learn amongst other things that Edelman has 17 twittering staff and Racepoint 8, whilst Drew Benvie has twittered 3779 times.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;d write here things like &amp;ldquo;AWESOME&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;WOW, HOW ENLIGHTENING&amp;rdquo;, but I understand sarcasm is the lowest form of wit so I&amp;rsquo;ll refrain.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>What&amp;rsquo;s with all the numbers? Why on Earth are they the story? But before I explain myself, I will just dwell on the numbers for a minute.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;hellip;I don&amp;rsquo;t know a Racepoint consultant who isn&amp;rsquo;t on Twitter, and there&amp;rsquo;s a lot more of us than eight people! How can Porter Novelli global digital director &lt;a href="http://mediaczar.com/blog/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mat Morrison&lt;/a>
feel so confident in his data? He should have at least added the caveat that one can only determine when a Twitter user is a consultant from a specific PR consultancy should the individual chose to promote the fact in their personal profile.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>