<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Do-Not-Track on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/do-not-track/</link><description>Recent content in Do-Not-Track on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/do-not-track/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How and why I strive to maintain my privacy – a post in light of the Snooper's Charter</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2016/11/strive-maintain-privacy/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2016/11/strive-maintain-privacy/</guid><description>&lt;p>[caption id=&amp;ldquo;attachment_30414&amp;rdquo; align=&amp;ldquo;alignnone&amp;rdquo; width=&amp;ldquo;1024&amp;rdquo;]&lt;img alt="GCHQ at Cheltenham, Gloucestershire" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/GCHQ.jpg"> An aerial image of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire.&lt;br>
Photographer: GCHQ/Crown Copyright. CC BY-SA 2.0[/caption]&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Arguing that you don&amp;rsquo;t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don&amp;rsquo;t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Edward Snowden, 2015 (&lt;a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/36ru89/just_days_left_to_kill_mass_surveillance_under/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">source&lt;/a>
)&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>I get asked now and then how to improve one&amp;rsquo;s personal privacy, digitally speaking. It&amp;rsquo;s unsurprising that such questions are directed my way given privacy is a core objective of &lt;a href="http://hi-project.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the hi:project&lt;/a>
, and yet I seemed to have attracted more than the usual number of questions since my last post – &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2016/10/introducing-google-assistant-surveillance-interface-si/">Introducing Google Assistant, the Surveillance Interface&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>You might want to stop commercial entities intruding – it&amp;rsquo;s difficult to sum up in a sentence or two how egregious the state of commercial surveillance is today. You might want to help head off the realisation of a surveillance state if only because you&amp;rsquo;ve read somewhere that such things don&amp;rsquo;t end well. You might simply want to have less data about your movements and purchases and media habits and general proclivities out there because it&amp;rsquo;s not a case of &lt;em>if&lt;/em> the corresponding databases are hacked but &lt;em>when&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Importantly, I write this post the very week the UK has passed the most extreme surveillance law ever passed in a democracy. The so-called Snoopers&amp;rsquo; Charter is disgusting, distressing and, in good part, stupid.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>