<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Democracy on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/democracy/</link><description>Recent content in Democracy on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/democracy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How social media might help put UK politics on the right track</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/05/how-social-media-might-help-put-uk-politics-on-the-right-track/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/05/how-social-media-might-help-put-uk-politics-on-the-right-track/</guid><description>&lt;p>Election 2010 was supposed to be the UK&amp;rsquo;s first social media powered election, but with the advent of our first ever Leaders Debates, it became resolutely a TV-powered election.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But that doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean same-interest groups aren&amp;rsquo;t coalescing and making their point online; quite the opposite. It&amp;rsquo;s just that the majority of the British public aren&amp;rsquo;t that engaged with social media just yet. And don&amp;rsquo;t start with that &amp;ldquo;but Obama did it in 2008&amp;rdquo; malarkey&amp;hellip; sure, he ran a great campaign, but when you break it down you find that the majority &amp;ldquo;online&amp;rdquo; effort was plain old email marketing. Good on him, but this hardly makes anyone&amp;rsquo;s definition of social media.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Let&amp;rsquo;s take a brief look at two campaigns running right now, post-election.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>