<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Centralization on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/centralization/</link><description>Recent content in Centralization on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/centralization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The unfreedom of filter bubbles – let's pop the bloody things</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2016/12/unfreedom-filter-bubbles-lets-pop-bloody-things/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2016/12/unfreedom-filter-bubbles-lets-pop-bloody-things/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="bubbles" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/bubbles.jpeg"> We could see it coming. Sort of.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I wrote a post titled &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2005/04/mychannel/">myChannel&lt;/a>
back in 2005, a time without smartphones, Facebook, Twitter and news aggregators like Flipboard. YouTube was 17 days off launching. Reviewing the tech landscape I concluded:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>&amp;hellip; mass personalisation has become a ‘qualifying’ rather than ‘winning’ criteria. The advantages to the user include choice (of the most apt personalisation), collation, and access in their own time and filtering. &amp;hellip;The user, the recipient of news and information, the listener, the viewer, the inter-actor, has been empowered to set the schedule. It’s what they want, when they want it and how they want it. They have one channel &amp;hellip; and they own it. It is myChannel.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Different kinds of privacy, empowerment and autonomy – centralized versus decentralized</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2015/04/different-kinds-of-privacy-empowerment-and-autonomy-centralized-versus-decentralized/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2015/04/different-kinds-of-privacy-empowerment-and-autonomy-centralized-versus-decentralized/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="qs-watch" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/qs-watch.png">[&lt;a href="http://hi-project.org/2015/03/different-kinds-of-privacy-empowerment-and-autonomy-centralized-versus-decentralized/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Originally posted to the hi:project blog&lt;/a>
.]&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In &lt;a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/2015/mar/25/google-sandy-pentland-separate-organisation-data" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">an article in the Guardian last week&lt;/a>
, Professor Alex &amp;lsquo;Sandy&amp;rsquo; Pentland mooted the potential for Google to cleave in two, with one part dedicated to providing a regulated bank-like service for data. Pentland directs the MIT Human Dynamics Lab and co-leads both the Big Data and the Personal Data and Privacy initiatives of the World Economic Forum, and I&amp;rsquo;m surprised how often his name crops up in my hi:project related research, yet I find it difficult to reconcile his observation here with &lt;a href="https://www.wired.com/2014/02/tech-shouldnt-built-free-markets-needs-based-exchanges/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">his fluency in the power of decentralized networks&lt;/a>
:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Social physics strongly suggest that the [Adam Smith’s] invisible hand is more due to trust, cooperation and robustness properties of the person-to-person network of exchanges than it is due to any magic in the workings of the market. If we want to have a fair, stable society, we need to look to the network of exchanges between people, and not to market competition.&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Pentland continues under the heading: &lt;em>How can we move from a market-centric to a human-centric society?&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>