<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Bureaucracy on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/bureaucracy/</link><description>Recent content in Bureaucracy on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/bureaucracy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Reusable KYC: when a dedication to decentralization self-sabotages</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2024/05/reusable-kyc-when-a-dedication-to-decentralization-self-sabotages/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2024/05/reusable-kyc-when-a-dedication-to-decentralization-self-sabotages/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="The Procession of the Trojan Horse into Troy, by Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo. An 18th Century painting depicting the citizens of Troy pushing and pulling the horse into their city." loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/The-Procession-of-the-Trojan-Horse-into-Troy-Tiepolo-1024.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Are we our own worst enemy?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://generative-identity.org/reusable-kyc/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Originally posted to the generative identity website&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Towards a shared understanding of ‘digital identity’ — reflecting on conversations with Doc Searls and Drummond Reed</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2021/03/towards-a-shared-understanding-of-digital-identity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2021/03/towards-a-shared-understanding-of-digital-identity/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="water ripples" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/water-ripples.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://generative-identity.org/towards-a-shared-understanding-of-digital-identity/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">First published to the generative identity website&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>No two people can share an exact understanding of anything deep and meaningful simply because we each have different contexts. Conversation relies upon and can never wholly substitute for context. Nevertheless, we can work to grow a shared understanding through conversation, and the relationship between conversationalists evolves in the process.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The relationship is immanent in such informational exchange[1].&lt;/p>
&lt;p>On one level, the opening paragraph here pertains to this being a blog post about conversations I’ve valued in recent months. But there’s another level given that ‘digital identity’ is our subject. Identity, in what you might call the natural and non-bureaucratic sense, is reciprocally defining and co-constitutive with relationships and information exchange[2].&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Identities are immanent in the relationships immanent in information exchange.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>