<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Book-Review on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/book-review/</link><description>Recent content in Book-Review on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/book-review/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Brand Anarchy</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/09/brand-anarchy/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/09/brand-anarchy/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1408157225" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;img alt="Brand Anarchy front cover" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/Brand-Anarchy-front-cover-200x300.jpg" title="Brand Anarchy front cover">&lt;/a>
The idea of a brand goes back to ancient times when ownership of livestock was asserted by burning one&amp;rsquo;s mark onto the animal. This post is about a book called Brand Anarchy, so I thought I&amp;rsquo;d set the scene.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The mark would be applied to the animal with a burning stick known as a firebrand. That word has morphed over the years to describe passionate individuals looking to shake things up, so it is then with etymological pleasure that I note the authors of Brand Anarchy are firebrands.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Communication Director Magazine book review – The Business of Influence</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/10/communication-director-magazine/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/10/communication-director-magazine/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Communication Director Magazine" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/communication-director-magazine.jpg" title="Communication Director Magazine">My book, &lt;a href="http://www.influenceprofessional.com" title="How many Tweets make a Like?" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;em>The Business of Influence&lt;/em>&lt;/a>
, has just been reviewed in &lt;a href="http://www.communication-director.eu/magazine/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Communication Director&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The magazine is billed as the professional specialist magazine for Corporate Communications and Public Relations in Europe. It documents opinions on important strategic questions in communication, discovers transnational developments and discusses their relevance from a European perspective. The publication is associated with the &lt;a href="http://www.eacd-online.eu/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">European Association of Communication Directors&lt;/a>
.&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="the-review">The review&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Page 90, Communication Director Magazine, September 2011&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;If you&amp;rsquo;re in business, you&amp;rsquo;re in the business of influence&amp;rdquo;. So begins a typically thought-provoking chapter from The Business of Influence that explores the concept of the Influence Scorecard and the non-tangible results of new communication tools.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Social Media Analytics</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/10/social-media-analytics/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/10/social-media-analytics/</guid><description>&lt;p>Are you savvy when it comes to social analytics? If you&amp;rsquo;re a PR practitioner, the answer to this question must be YES.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Marshall Sponder visited London last week as part of &lt;a href="http://learnmore.mcgraw-hill.com/2011/08/19/smablogtour/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">his tour&lt;/a>
promoting his new book, &lt;em>Social Media Analytics – Effective Tools for Building, Interpreting, and Using Metrics&lt;/em> (ISBN 978-0-07-176829-0). Having read a draft manuscript of the book, a quote of mine appears on the front cover: &amp;ldquo;Ignoring this book is akin to ignoring your market.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Social Media Analytics, Marshall Sponder" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/socialmediaanalytics-202x300.jpg" title="Social Media Analytics, Marshall Sponder">There is no better independent authority on the tools and techniques than Marshall. Whilst some pundits simply maintain lists of social analytics vendors with some basic feature comparison tables, Marshall has actually used many of them for real. Moreover, he has a peculiar ability to prod the vendors and the engineers that build these services, to get under the hood and separate the actual capabilities from the marketing claims.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Marshall is not, however, a public relations practitioner or management consultant. This book does not provide a strategic framework for the integration of social analytics into your organisation. It does not address important issues such as privacy (of customers, employees and the wider public) or ethics. It doesn&amp;rsquo;t attempt to define a detailed taxonomy of the analytics services out there, or make this a comprehensive market review.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>