<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>American-Marketing-Association on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/american-marketing-association/</link><description>Recent content in American-Marketing-Association on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/american-marketing-association/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Public Relations Defined – The PRSA invites you to help set a new definition of PR</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/11/public-relations-defined--the-prsa-invites-you-to-help-set-a-new-definition-of-pr/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/11/public-relations-defined--the-prsa-invites-you-to-help-set-a-new-definition-of-pr/</guid><description>&lt;p>Here&amp;rsquo;s how the &lt;a href="http://prdefinition.prsa.org/index.php/2011/10/30/about-the-prsa-public-relations-defined-initiative/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">corresponding blog post by the PRSA&lt;/a>
describes its &amp;ldquo;Public Relations Defined&amp;rdquo; initiative:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>As part of its mission to advance the public relations profession and professional, the &lt;a href="http://www.prsa.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Public Relations Society of America&lt;/a>
(PRSA) has introduced a new initiative to modernize the definition of public relations and increase its value. As the digital age has caused significant shifts in how organizations communicate internally and externally, a question frequently asked by the public, media and practitioners is, &amp;ldquo;What is public relations?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>The PRSA explains the initiative in these simple terms:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Recent discussions, &lt;a href="http://soulati.com/blog/what-is-pr" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">blog posts&lt;/a>
, tweets and &lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/node/17722733?story_id=17722733&amp;amp;CFID=151713722&amp;amp;CFTOKEN=36083756" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">mainstream articles&lt;/a>
have suggested that (1) public relations professionals (and, thus, the audiences we serve) continue to struggle with the question: &amp;ldquo;What is PR?&amp;rdquo;; (2) many industry professionals are unhappy with the current definitions; and (3) no one definition is considered &amp;ldquo;the&amp;rdquo; de facto industry definition.&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>What more justification do we need?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>While my book &lt;a href="http://www.influenceprofessional.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;em>The Business of Influence&lt;/em>&lt;/a>
sets out to be a rethink of the &amp;lsquo;influence disciplines&amp;rsquo;, it starts by reviewing current definitions of marketing and PR. &amp;ldquo;Well, this book wants to map out a journey from A to B, and navigating to B is so much easier if we&amp;rsquo;re all at A to begin with.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In hoping to contribute to the renewed debate, I&amp;rsquo;ve reproduced the book&amp;rsquo;s definitions section here. Now all I need to do is work out if the PRSA will be open to a definition leaning on the Influence Scorecard and the role of Chief Influence Officer. What do you think?&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>