<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Algorithm on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/algorithm/</link><description>Recent content in Algorithm on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/algorithm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The unfreedom of filter bubbles – let's pop the bloody things</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2016/12/unfreedom-filter-bubbles-lets-pop-bloody-things/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2016/12/unfreedom-filter-bubbles-lets-pop-bloody-things/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="bubbles" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/bubbles.jpeg"> We could see it coming. Sort of.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I wrote a post titled &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2005/04/mychannel/">myChannel&lt;/a>
back in 2005, a time without smartphones, Facebook, Twitter and news aggregators like Flipboard. YouTube was 17 days off launching. Reviewing the tech landscape I concluded:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>&amp;hellip; mass personalisation has become a ‘qualifying’ rather than ‘winning’ criteria. The advantages to the user include choice (of the most apt personalisation), collation, and access in their own time and filtering. &amp;hellip;The user, the recipient of news and information, the listener, the viewer, the inter-actor, has been empowered to set the schedule. It’s what they want, when they want it and how they want it. They have one channel &amp;hellip; and they own it. It is myChannel.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>