<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Adobe on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/adobe/</link><description>Recent content in Adobe on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/tags/adobe/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>"We called it influencing the influencers." Adobe. Late-80s.</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/08/called-influencing-influencers-adobe-late-80s/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/08/called-influencing-influencers-adobe-late-80s/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Adobe influencing the influencers" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/Adobe-influencing-the-influencers.png">You have been influenced when you think something you wouldn&amp;rsquo;t otherwise have thought, or do something you wouldn&amp;rsquo;t otherwise have done.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In the 20th Century, the marketing department did marketing, the PR people did PR, and no job title included the word &lt;em>influence&lt;/em>. To this day, no role or team or department in the typical organization incorporates the word, which is why I pivot my client workshops around the topic of influencing and being influenced – not only does it address the actual thing we&amp;rsquo;re all interested in, it helps lower ego defence and removes functional blinkers.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Fancy a coffee? Social business and your non-solicitation terms</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/05/fancy-coffee-social-business-non-solicitation-terms/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/05/fancy-coffee-social-business-non-solicitation-terms/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Department of Coffee" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/departmentofcoffee_cup.jpg">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The &lt;a href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/apr/24/apple-google-settle-antitrust-lawsuit-hiring-collusion" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent antitrust lawsuit against Apple, Google, Adobe and Intel for collusion in hiring practices&lt;/a>
demonstrates a lack of respect for the respective organisations&amp;rsquo; employees. Fundamentally, how dare one&amp;rsquo;s employer collude with another in ways that may limit one&amp;rsquo;s career progression!&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Having been an employer carrying the not insubstantial costs of hiring I know how difficult it is to watch someone in whom you have invested considerable time, money and energy walk out the door, but I think my memory serves me well when I say we encouraged the team to celebrate such departures. If anything, our alumni network grew +1 each time.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>