<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Seosem on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/categories/seosem/</link><description>Recent content in Seosem on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/categories/seosem/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Future Vistas for SEO</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/04/future-vistas-for-seo/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/04/future-vistas-for-seo/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed&lt;/a>
_code/12522700&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Brighton Dome – the front of the queue for Brighton SEO" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/Brighton-Dome-225x300.jpg" title="Brighton Dome – the front of the queue for Brighton SEO">The Brighton &lt;a href="http://www.brightonseo.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SEO conference&lt;/a>
is, I believe, the largest of its kind in the UK. We&amp;rsquo;re expecting over 1,000 delegates today. I&amp;rsquo;m up immediately after the &amp;ldquo;Ask the engines&amp;rdquo; panel featuring representatives from both Google and Bing, and you can peruse my stack above on where I think the third decade of the web&amp;rsquo;s development might take today&amp;rsquo;s SEO practitioners.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>SEO changing up its game... it's called PR</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/07/seo-changing-up-its-game-its-called-pr/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/07/seo-changing-up-its-game-its-called-pr/</guid><description>&lt;p>My recent post &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2010/07/wheres-your-brain-at-wheres-your-consultancy-at/">Where&amp;rsquo;s your brain at? Where&amp;rsquo;s your consultancy at?&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; was prompted by a fascinating discussion at the &lt;a href="http://ciprsm.wikispaces.com/Social&amp;#43;Summer" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CIPR Social Summer session&lt;/a>
on the 1st July at which we debated aspects of search engine optimisation (SEO) and the PR profession&amp;rsquo;s paralysing hesitancy to grasp the SEO nettle.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Well personally I&amp;rsquo;m excited not paralysed, and I keep a beady eye on great information sources such as SEOmoz and Search Engine Watch, and I&amp;rsquo;m posting today to highlight a couple of posts I&amp;rsquo;ve just found.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.seomoz.org" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;img alt="seomoz logo" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/seomoz.png" title="seomoz logo">&lt;/a>
Rand Fishkin, SEOmoz&amp;rsquo;s CEO, has written a super perspective that should be read by everyone interested in the ebb and flow of the SEO world, particularly as it relates to activity one might consider to be in the PR domain. &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-death-and-rebirth-of-editorial-citation-on-the-web" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Death and Rebirth of Editorial Citation on the Web&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; identifies three epoques to date of web linking activity:&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Where&amp;#039;s your brain at? Where&amp;#039;s your consultancy at?</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/07/wheres-your-brain-at-wheres-your-consultancy-at/</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2010/07/wheres-your-brain-at-wheres-your-consultancy-at/</guid><description>&lt;p>Do you &amp;lsquo;do&amp;rsquo; search engine optimisation? If so, it seems you are most probably a SEO consultant because public relations consultants who &amp;lsquo;get&amp;rsquo; SEO appear to be very thin on the ground. Not only that, but some argue that&amp;rsquo;s how it should be.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img alt="SEO%2C%20search%20engine%20optimisation%2C%20left%20brain%2C%20right%20brain%2C%20PR" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/brain_seo_influence_professional.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nixon McInnes’&lt;/a>
managing director Will McInnes, ever the polemicist perhaps, asserted during yesterday evening&amp;rsquo;s conversation on SEO that to fuse the two disciplines would have to entail some kind of genetic engineering along the lines of a pig-monkey hybrid.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Visualise your SEO</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/02/visualise-your-seo/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2009/02/visualise-your-seo/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.tableausoftware.com" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tableau Software&lt;/a>
knows just a thing or two about data visualisation. A spin out from Stanford, the company won the CODiE award for best business intelligence solution 2008&amp;hellip; it&amp;rsquo;s amazing what the faculty of visualisation can do for your intelligence, or your PR as anyone who has followed my obsession with data visualisation in public relations will know I believe. (Previous posts on the topic appended.)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.tableausoftware.com/blog/easy-seo-keyword-analysis" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tableau Software&amp;rsquo;s Niels Hoven has posted about using visualisation techniques&lt;/a>
(and a nifty Excel plug-in from Microsoft) to delve into the content of rival websites to determine keyword effectiveness and make your final keyword selection. He even rounds off by employing visualisation to measure the effectiveness of your SEO work. Nifty.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The power of social bookmarking and how to use it in your organisation today</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/08/the-power-of-social-bookmarking-and-how-to-use-it-in-your-organisation-today/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/08/the-power-of-social-bookmarking-and-how-to-use-it-in-your-organisation-today/</guid><description>&lt;p>The more stuff there is, the more difficult it is to find the right stuff at the right time.  Guess that&amp;rsquo;s almost Google&amp;rsquo;s raison d&amp;rsquo;etre, but have they got it right?  Is there a better or alternative search approach for you and your colleagues, and what would this mean for your marketing and search engine optimisation (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SEO&lt;/a>
)?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img alt="by%20Vit%F3%20http%3A//www.flickr.com/photos/janeladeimagens/166051502/" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/haystack.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Google&amp;rsquo;s highly secretive approach to working out what might be more relevant to your search query is called &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/tech.html" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">PageRank&lt;/a>
. Fundamentally, their innovation counts a link to a website as a vote for that website&amp;rsquo;s content.  And a link to your site from a higher PageRanked site is worth more than a link from a lowly site.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This approach blew the competition away (remember Alta Vista?), and Microsoft and Yahoo! have been playing catchup since.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But when was the last time you hyperlinked to a website?&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Summize - Twitter sentiment analytics</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/05/summize-twitter-sentiment-analytics/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/05/summize-twitter-sentiment-analytics/</guid><description>&lt;p>Those of you who follow my blog will know I&amp;rsquo;m currently into Social Web Analytics. &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/posts/philip.sheldrake/social-web-analytics---my-upcoming-ebook-and-a-case-of-cobblers-shoes">Here&amp;rsquo;s my last post on the topic&lt;/a>
. So some interesting news from Summize&amp;rsquo;s labs, a new semantic analysis tool to give you a snapshot of the feeling in the Twittersphere.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://labs.summize.com/sentiment" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Simply go here&lt;/a>
and enter the brand or object name in which you&amp;rsquo;re interested. Here&amp;rsquo;s one I did earlier&amp;hellip;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img alt="Summize%20labs%20-%20sentiment%20analysis" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/summize.png">&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Does your campaign measure up to search?</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/02/does-your-campaign-measure-up-to-search/</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2008/02/does-your-campaign-measure-up-to-search/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="How%20influential%20is%20my%20campaign%3F" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/search.png">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The evaluation of PR campaign effectiveness is controversial. Forget for a moment the inadequate practitioners that insist all PR must have a benefit so better just get on with it than devote energy to measuring it, and you&amp;rsquo;re left with an array of evaluation processes as diverse as the number of agencies.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="return-on-investment">Return on investment&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The most over-used term is ROI. And that applies to all marketing disciplines not just PR. For example, I posted last week about the &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/posts/philip.sheldrake/onmedia-best-of-broadband-advertising-awards-2007">winners of OnMedia&amp;rsquo;s Best of Broadband Advertising awards&lt;/a>
, yet when you read the rationale justifying OnMedia&amp;rsquo;s selections only three out of ten make an attempt to link the campaign to a fillip to the client&amp;rsquo;s bottom line. &amp;ldquo;Creative&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;ROI&amp;rdquo; are not synonymous.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>