<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Customer-Service on Philip Sheldrake</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/categories/customer-service/</link><description>Recent content in Customer-Service on Philip Sheldrake</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philipsheldrake.com/categories/customer-service/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Big data. Big trust.</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/02/big-data-big-trust/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2014/02/big-data-big-trust/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/philip_sheldrake/9134388448" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;img alt="trust" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/trust.jpg">&lt;/a>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This morning, my colleague &lt;a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/hectorarthur" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hector Arthur&lt;/a>
pointed me to a new report from Ovum&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="uk.linkedin.com/pub/mark-little/4/3aa/6b8">Mark Little&lt;/a>
knowing I&amp;rsquo;d have a few comments to make. In the corresponding blog post – &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://ovum.com/2014/02/17/big-trust-is-big-datas-missing-dna/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Big Trust is Big Data’s missing DNA&lt;/a>
&amp;rdquo; – Mark kicks off with:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>In the rush to monetize customer data, companies risk diminishing the trust people have in services and brands. Sustaining and growing people’s trust in services is not just about “doing the right thing,” but also makes commercial sense.&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>As I like to say in other words, big data is worth more when wielded &lt;em>with&lt;/em> customers rather than &lt;em>at&lt;/em> them. Ovum calls this approach Big Trust.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Big Trust strategies are designed to build “trust equity” with customers as a basis for making core services stickier, for selling new services, and for brokering personal data to commerce under a new set of trust principles.&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;h3 id="public-relations">Public relations&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>The outlook is informed, directly or indirectly I know not, by the excellence theory of public relations presented by James E Grunig more than twenty years ago, which champions the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_E._Grunig" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">two-way symmetrical&lt;/a>
PR model. This model uses communication to negotiate with the public, resolve conflict and promote mutual understanding and respect between the organization and its stakeholders. My &lt;a href="http://eulerpartners.com/influence-flows/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Six Influence Flows&lt;/a>
model from 2011 extends this work for the digital / social / big data age, and you can find out &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2011/11/public-relations-defined-%e2%80%93-the-prsa-invites-you-to-help-set-a-new-definition-of-pr/" title="Public Relations Defined – The PRSA invites you to help set a new definition of PR">more about PR models in my post here&lt;/a>
if it&amp;rsquo;s your thing.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Of course, this is not how the majority of practitioners practice PR, deferring instead to publicity and &amp;lsquo;spin&amp;rsquo;, which may be associated more closely with distrust than trust. But excellent practice is championed if, as a shrewd procurer, you know where to look.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>'Earned media' is not a synonym for public relations</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/04/earned-media-is-not-a-synonym-for-public-relations/</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2012/04/earned-media-is-not-a-synonym-for-public-relations/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img alt="British Heart Foundation outdoor ad, Leo Reynolds, http://www.flickr.com/photos/lwr/2138006896" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/british_heart_foundation_outdoor_ad-300x200.jpg" title="British Heart Foundation outdoor ad, Leo Reynolds, http://www.flickr.com/photos/lwr/2138006896">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;Categorising media as Paid, Owned and Earned isn’t particularly useful. In fact, it simply appears to reinforce increasingly irrelevant functional silos.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That&amp;rsquo;s how I opened a blog post back in November, &lt;a href="https://philipsheldrake.com/wp/2011/11/the-influence-view-of-content-0-1/">The Influence View of Content&lt;/a>
, and three incidents over the last couple of weeks have redoubled my determination to cut this crap.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Names have been changed&amp;hellip;&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="incident-1">Incident 1&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Anne: &amp;ldquo;So our marketing team looks after the website, the blog and Facebook. And PR is obviously earned media – the traditional media relations, blogger relations and the like. They cover Twitter too, at least most of the time.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Me: &amp;ldquo;So if we&amp;rsquo;re looking at things like that, let me ask where the concept of shared media takes us&amp;hellip; the owned stuff that has earned a share – a &amp;lsquo;Like&amp;rsquo;, a RT, a +1 for example.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Santander UK Chief Executive Ana Botín gets a free copy of The Business of Influence</title><link>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/07/santander-uk-chief-executive-ana-botin-gets-a-free-copy-of-the-business-of-influence/</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philipsheldrake.com/2011/07/santander-uk-chief-executive-ana-botin-gets-a-free-copy-of-the-business-of-influence/</guid><description>&lt;p>[caption id=&amp;quot;&amp;quot; align=&amp;ldquo;alignright&amp;rdquo; width=&amp;ldquo;300&amp;rdquo; caption=&amp;ldquo;Image via Wikipedia&amp;rdquo;]&lt;a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ana_Patricia_Bot%C3%ADn_en_el_Foro_Econ%C3%B3mico_Mundial.jpg" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">&lt;img alt="Ana Patricia Botín, Member of the Board, Grupo&amp;hellip;" loading="lazy" src="https://philipsheldrake.com/images/300px-Ana_Patricia_Bot%C3%ADn_en_el_Foro_Econ%C3%B3mico_Mundial.jpg" title="Ana Patricia Botín, Member of the Board, Grupo...">&lt;/a>
[/caption]&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In an endeavour to improve customer satisfaction, &lt;a href="http://www.santander.co.uk" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Santander UK&lt;/a>
Chief Executive Ana Botín has taken the decision this week to bring call centres back from India to the UK.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Actually, &amp;ldquo;to improve customer service&amp;rdquo; is possibly looking at the situation glass half full when perhaps it&amp;rsquo;s actually half empty. More accurately, the move appears primarily motivated by a desire to reduce customer dissatisfaction.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Call centres were offshored in 2003 (when the banking operation was known as Abbey – acquired by Santander Group in 2004).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Interestingly, &lt;a href="http://mnwh.li/pwmlWd" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the FT reports&lt;/a>
that Santander UK&amp;rsquo;s move follows a diktat by the UK&amp;rsquo;s Financial Services Authority that banks publish complaint numbers for the first time in 2010, making Santander more visibly the most complained-about bank for the first half of the year, and second only to Barclays during the second half.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>